This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Olympics

  • Email marketing best practice: a look back at the Olympics

    07 December 2012

    We can safely say that The London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) did a fantastic job of engaging the nation, but can the same be said for its email campaign? While Return Path didn’t work directly with LOCOG, using our email intelligence analysis tools, we looked back at the Olympic campaign to gauge its effectiveness. Our findings explicitly show that LOCOG was well informed around email marketing best practices.

    For example, before executing the Olympic email programme, LOCOG ensured it was fully prepared for what was to be one of the biggest email campaigns of the year by warming up its IP address. Because spam is associated with high-volume short-term spikes LOCOG sent out emails at a low rate during the early days of its campaign to show the ISPs it wasn’t a spammer.

    As the Olympics drew nearer and the hype began to build, LOCOG ramped up its sending activity. Initially, this generated a number of complaints, causing an initial dip in LOCOG’s sender score. However, the situation quickly stabilised because of the high “this is not spam” rates the campaign received which act as a great indication of positive engagement. On average, over 40% of the panel subscribers read and forwarded LOCOG‘s messages, with near 100% read rates being achieved for some key message types.

    LOCOG’s campaign maintained an outstanding Sender Score of close to 100 - well above the UK average of 87 (as per Return Path’s recently published Email Intelligence report). Having a good Sender Score is vital to deliverability success as this number provides a barometer of where your emails are likely to end up. The practices carried out by LOCOG in the warm up process combined with the positive subscriber interaction signals significantly bumped up LOCOG’s Sender Score.

    LOCOG’s email campaign stands as an excellent example of best practice for email marketers. In total, LOCOG had an email base of around four million subscribers and sent approximately 83 million emails. By effectively warming up the new IP address, and then successfully harnessing positive subscriber engagement, the email programme successfully overcame the primary deliverability challenges that would normally have resulted in much poorer performance by a programme of this nature.

    By Guy Hanson, director, response consulting, Return Path

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Olympics

  • Changing the game

    26 October 2012

    The Olympics has once again transformed our relationship with content – and changed the agenda for both broadcasters and brands.

    Revolution is built into the DNA of the Olympic movement. Each Olympiad delivers its own never-to-be-repeated moment in time and its own claim to being the greatest Games. As a proud Brit I feel this way about London 2012 but I also know that people felt the same way about Beijing, Barcelona and Athens. And as somebody who works in the TV industry, I know that the unique feelings aroused by each Games are due in great part to the very different ways in which we watch them.

    The world’s experience of the Olympics changes fundamentally each and every time that it comes around. It leaps forward – and in doing so, it changes global audiences’ relationship with the content that they consume. From the first TV broadcast coverage of the London Games of 1948 through to the 5,000 hours of HD footage broadcast from Beijing in 2008, the innovations that broadcasters use to bring us closer to the action have a permanent impact on the way that we read, listen and watch.

    When the Games returned to London in 2012, it wasn’t just the relationship of consumers to content that shifted; the type of connections that brands sought to create with consumers through that content changed too. For the first time in history, advertisers chose to look beyond the awareness-building potential of the Olympics to get actively involved in the way their target audiences actually experienced the Games.

    As host broadcaster, the BBC’s commitment to covering every second of every event at every venue was made possible by a major shift towards digital platforms and personal choice. Brands responded in similar fashion by moving beyond the pre-recorded ad to respond to events as they happened. AT&T’s Rethink Possible ads were just as live as NBC’s prime-time Olympic coverage, with details of athletes’ actual performance inserted into ads that ran just after the performances themselves were aired. In the UK, Royal Mail proved that offline, owned media could also deliver relevant, rapid response, through its gold-painted postboxes and limited edition stamps.

    This new definition of Live took viewers beyond the sensation of “it’s just like being there” because now they could be anywhere they needed to be, at any moment. This content experience wasn’t just real-time, it was hyper-personalised – something again reflected in brand activity with Samsung leveraging social media to demonstrate audiences’ individual connection to athletes.

    The danger for marketers is falling into the “next best thing is all” trap. We’ve been here before with ‘search’ and ‘social’. Now brands that simply leap onto the real-time or hyper-personalised bandwagon risk missing something just as important about London 2012. It’s crucial to remember that this was also a unique shared community experience where the idea of ‘Being Part’ of the Games was key. It offered an experience that was hyper-personal yet also communal, with the full range of social media used to drive participation and connection – and it showed that human nature doesn’t always mean wanting to be treated as an individual. It suggests that the future for both brands and broadcasters lies in fusing our ability to deliver the real-time and individualised, with the all-important sense of participation in great shared experiences.

    How will that sense of the individualised and the communal take shape in Rio, four years from now? A sense of corporate and brand responsibility seems a likely contender to provide that sense of something bigger – as does Rio’s cultural history of carnival, which gives brands great opportunity to build richer and more resonant entertainment experiences around the Games. Both continue themes that existed in embryonic form in London but could be developed far more effectively in the future.

    But brands cannot afford to wait four years to again be a part of how content is consumed. Audiences’ demand for individual participation and collective, emotional experiences isn’t about to be packed away until Rio. It exists wherever powerful content exists.

    Once a new type of content experience has been anointed at the Olympics, it stays with us for good. The challenge for brands, like those competing against the likes of Usain Bolt this summer, is to keep up.

    By Chris Dobson, executive vice-president & general manager, BBC Advertising

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Olympics

  • Which of the London 2012 sponsors won the 'Socialympics'?

    13 September 2012

    An interesting graph to share from Sociagility, which charts the rise and fall of the 25 main London 2012 Olympic sponsors based on their social media performance throughout the Games. The report assessed the sponsors’ performance across the web, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube over a period of five months. 

     

     

    Keep an eye out for M&M Global’s Special Report on the London 2012 Olympics in the Q3 issue of M&M Global.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Social Media, Social, Olympics

  • A lot can happen in 9.63 seconds! It’s in the data!

    16 August 2012

    While you were watching the 100m at London 2012 come and go in a flash, did you ever consider what happens online during that time - all day, every day? Specifically, within 9.63 seconds 16.660 tweets are composed, 110.000 Facebook posts are uploaded, 28 million emails are sent, and 255.000 product images are displayed by Criteo. So what connects this remarkable feat of human achievement with the online environment? Well in some ways it is quite simple, big data!

    Sir Tim Berners Lee was a fitting part of the Olympics opening in what was an amazing representation of societal and cultural developments in British history. We are now at a stage where the online revolution is an integral part of our daily lives. As Usain Bolt ran the second quickest time in history, people clamoured for an internet connection to share their thoughts through online forums, Facebook and Twitter. This need for online is only going to grow exponentially as Usain Bolt and his adversaries train harder to improve their times.

    Looking at BBC’s coverage of the event, it was data that glued it together. The BBC covered every event with extreme sophistication. The latest technologies and techniques were employed to ensure that the viewer felt an integral part of each sport. But consider this, if you take the Olympics branding and cultural melee of the whole event away for a moment, the factor that connected the event was statistics. The medal tables unified countries – it was a constant race to achieve more and subsequently be placed above rivals. Just think of the doping scandal and the recalibration that was required when the Woman’s shot putter was relieved of her medal. And then there was the analytics surrounding these achievements, with intricate economics employed to assess whether the levels of funding in developing our athletes were justified.  

    Taking it another way, the Olympics were only made possible by the advertisers and sponsors that supported the event with a wealth of data. In much the same way that individuals were keen to find the most up-to-date information in real-time to ‘stay ahead of the games’, advertising spend online enabled publishers to monetise this content. But it wasn’t just that. The effectiveness of online advertising also increased significantly by an ability to respond to consumer needs in real-time with relevant products, thereby enhancing the whole process.

    Every 9.63 seconds, Criteo presents 255,000 images from over 3,000 advertisers. As a result, if there is a sudden interest in Usain Bolt’s trainers or Beats headphones (as used by the swimmers) retailers can respond. Makes you think next time you sit for 10 seconds!

    by Michael Steckler, managing director Northern Europe and Benelux, Criteo

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Social Media, Advertising, Olympics

  • Samsung takes the trophy

    16 August 2012

    Two-thirds of the Olympic organising committee's £2bn ($3.14bn) operating budget has been raised through sponsorship. So why is the UK public not thanking big business?

    It can be difficult to prove sport sponsorship's return on investment and yet the Olympic sponsors paid handsomely to associate themselves with the 'greatest show on Earth'. So was Olympic sponsorship worth it?

    Precise analysed social media conversations about the sponsors over a two week period. We found that sponsors fared very differently to one-another when measured on favourability and not just buzz, with the sentiment scores of the top four sponsors by share of voice ranging from +89 to -7.

    McDonald's generated the most brand mentions out of all the sponsors; however, these mentions were predominately negative. Based on favourability, Samsung stands out from the crowd and excelled at generating sponsorship-related news across social media. It also benefited from clever product placement. More than a third of all comments about the brand related to its mobile devices' supporting roles in the Opening Ceremony; even though the logo and brand name were not in view.

    Coca-Cola also benefited from playing such a visible role in the Torch Relay and, largely, overcame issues related to its perceived suitability as a sponsor. It managed to tap into popular culture and inspire excitement by hosting 'Move to the Beat' music events, which were mentioned several hundred times. Linking itself with respected celebrities such as Mark Ronson, added to Coca-Cola's appeal.

    On the face of it, the opportunity to influence online conversations during the 'first truly social Games' was immense. However, sponsoring the Games does not guarantee good favour. Sponsors need to go above and beyond to earn the right to association.

    by James Withey, head of brand insight, Precise

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Social Media, Social, Olympics

  • Is it really worth sponsoring the Olympics?

    07 June 2012

    The Olympics – a major international sporting event that comes around every four years. It’s no wonder that brands are keen to pay big bucks to get involved...

    But is it really worth forking out all that cash? What value do brands really get out of it?

    I came across some research earlier from Opinium Research, who has been keeping a close eye on not only this year’s official Olympic sponsors, but also the brands that have no connection with the Games, but that are benefiting from it.

    A survey of 2,000 people in the UK showed that only 10% of Brits are aware that BMW is an official Olympics partner. McDonald’s and Coca-Cola came out on top as the most recognised Olympic sponsors, with almost half of the UK aware that they are partners, with the awareness growing even more as we get closer to the London 2012 Olympic Games. Coca-Cola, in fact, has seen the biggest increase of 10 points between January and April.

    But what is more interesting is that while brands pay a lot of money to be associated with the Olympics, those that aren’t involved are mistakenly getting credit from the public.

    A fifth (22%) of Brits mistakenly believe that EDF’s rival British Gas is a partner to the Olympics. Meanwhile, Visa, British Airways, Lloyds TSB and Coca-Cola may not be so happy to find that their biggest rivals Mastercard (20%), Virgin Atlantic (18%), HSBC (14%) and Pepsi (11%) are thought of as being partners to the Olympics. 

    It’s clear that the big global brands among us – such as McDonald’s and Coca-Cola – have a lot to gain from sponsoring a major sporting event such as the Olympics, but, as this latest research shows, maybe you don’t have to fork out the big bucks to increase brand awareness.

    See also: Brands hit the right note - a recent piece we did with the official sponsors of the MTV EMAs to see what they got out of sponsoring an international event.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Jenni Baker

    Tags: brand awareness, Sponsorship, Olympics