This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

Go Back

Talent

  • Who wants to be a CEO?

    07 February 2012

    By Kamini Banga, brand consultant

    Think hard before you say yes to the above question. Listening to chief executives, economists and academics at the World Economic Forum in Davos, it appears that business today is between a rock and a hard place and it is a wonder that they can do anything at all. Well, there are several rocks and hard places really. Here is a list that came up again and again during different discussions.

    Short term versus the Long termboth are critical – in a rapidly changing environment staying on course for long term goals and future vision is critical for business. These gains may come at the expense of short term pain and this cannot be easy for business leaders most of whom are under constant scrutiny from shareholders, society, government and the media.

    Globalisation versus Protectionismone gives rise to the other – it is evident to everyone that globalisation is in everybody’s interest. Developed countries need to extend their global footprints to economies that are growing rapidly (read developing nations). That is not enough, for them to remain competitive they also need to offshore their manufacturing to many of these countries. However, rising unemployment and declining economies makes it imperative to first protect jobs at home. Migration policy also needs tightening as scarce jobs become scarcer with skilled migrant workers hungry for jobs. It would seem as if protectionism is a natural outcome of globalisation.

    Young versus Oldnot either or – as current models of capitalism and globalisation come for scrutiny and debate, there is a need for new models that call for greater disruption than those who grew up in the old world order will allow or have the skills to bring about. Unfortunately, the young are lacking the right education and the necessary skills to change the old models that perhaps need revision or a complete overhaul. Business versus the Government – friends or foes – while some regulation is certainly needed, there is perhaps a greater need to deregulate some areas that might be holding back growth. Labour laws and FDI rules are only some of the areas where easing stranglehold of policy might create jobs and increase competitiveness. Michael Porter presented a study done among HBS alumni that shows a decline in the US business competitiveness, primarily, because of government interventions. India has the same story, unfortunately.

    Business versus Society – certainly not friends – With rising income and inequality in both developed and developed economies becoming a tinder box, the debate on the 1% versus the 99% is finding expression in Occupy Wally Street, the Arab spring, Anna Hazare movement in India, riots in Britain and Wukan in China among other parts of the globe.

    Business versus Mediaadversaries – Media perhaps has overreached itself in its role as watchdog. They are now crucifying business without presenting a balanced view of events. Bankers have been their target and as a consequence everybody loves to hate them. Is the stigma of the financial world coming to haunt the entire business world?

    With so many challenges and so many adversaries is it any surprise that business is in the state that it is. While everybody seems to have taken a position against them, it is important to remind ourselves that business is the engine for growth, job creation and upward mobility. There is a need for civil society, government and business to come together to create a future that cannot be built without cooperation and collaboration.

    This blog post was spotted on The Economic Times

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Bloggers' Gallery

    Tags: Business models, Talent

  • A moral compass that points two ways

    04 July 2011

    Nike is a company that bases its strategy on the celebrating the cult of the individual. This strategy has brought with it plenty of success, not only did it triumph at last year’s FIFA World Cup, but it also ranks as the most valuable sports brand in Interbrand’s top 100. However, by elevating the status of the individual also comes risks.

    Nike are the sponsors of adulterous Tiger Woods, who shattered his family image when it emerged he’d picked up a host of extra-curricular friends as he travelled the world with his golf bag providing the perfect alibi.

    They also backed one of the NBA’s biggest stars in the shape of the LA Lakers’ Kobe Bryant who faced the long wrangle of a court case over allegations of sexual assault.

    And the Tour de Force of the Tour de France, Lance Armstrong always found it difficult to shake the stench of unproven allegations over performance enhancing drugs.

    But the case of Michael Vick is a special one. Not only because he was convicted and jailed for arranging underground dog fighting, but also because unusually Nike didn’t stand by their man, dropping him with a verbal barrage.

    For the uninitiated, here’s just a quick peek at the rap sheet that Vick met in court:

    -  Hanging dogs with a wooden plank between two trees

    -  Drowning dogs by placing their heads in a five gallon bucket of water

    -  Breaking the back and necks of dogs by slamming them into the ground several times

    -  Shooting dogs with handgun

    -  Electrocuting dogs at a property owned purely for the purposes of arranging dog fights.

    M&M is all for giving second chances and trusting in the rehabilitative powers of prison, but to swing so wildly between the two – acting with moral outrage only to later champion the resurrection of a fallen hero (and undoubtedly relishing the notion that all publicity is good publicity) – is hypocrisy of the highest order.

    Expect the next Nike sports watch to come with a compass that points both north and south.

    They should also be ashamed if produce any more ads like this

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Josh Colley

    Tags: Reputation, Talent, Sponsorship

  • VOTE OR DIE!

    09 August 2010

    Well not really, but it worked for P Diddy, Papa Diddy Puff, Puff Daddy, Diddy or Sean – whatever he is calling himself now a days.

     P Diddy 'Vote or Die'

    Now that I have your attention, why not vote for the M&M International Marketer of Year and the Media Excellence Award!

    Our International Marketer of the Year Award celebrates the people that have helped drive brand activity across market. It promises to be hotly contested with AB InBev’s Maarten L Albarda, Nike’s Trevor Edwards, Samsung’s Ines Van Gennip, PepsiCo’s Seth Kaufman and Sony’s Ben Moore all nominated.

     If you prefer brand activity then there’s also The Media Excellence Award, which recognises the advertisers that have demonstrated innovation and creativity in their media strategy. The shortlist includes Credit Suisse, LVMH, Philips, Shell and World Cup hosts South Africa.

    You can dissect the nominees, and vote for both awards, by doing the decent thing by voting and not dying!

    VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! VOTE!

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Martina Lacey

    Tags: Talent