This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

About this blog

M&M’s Blog goes behind the headlines to offer a running commentary on the business dynamics within the international media and marketing industry. The M&M editorial team joins forces with industry experts and local market heroes to balance a bird’s eye view of global trends with the importance of local insight.

RSS feed Subscribe to blog feed

  • What brands can learn from the Ghana Think Tank

    31 August 2011

    Cross-cultural marketing is one of the most challenging disciplines in business today. Marketing to people in different socio-economic groups is difficult, but once you layer on cultural biases, the challenge increases exponentially.

    An example of how something can work well in one country, but not for another, can be taken from a visit I made to the Vava’u Island Group in Tonga. As we stepped off the plane we found a brand new control tower and baggage center, the building of which had been funded by the European Union.

    However, we did not go inside. Instead, luggage was delivered by hand at the wooden hut on the other side of the airfield, just as it had been for many years. I am sure the control tower seemed a great investment in Europe, but with only two scheduled flights a day and no one trained to use the equipment, it was completely redundant in Tonga.

    A couple of months ago, I came across a collaborative project that seeks to highlight the friction created by cultural differences, and while its focus is on community and foreign aid, I think it holds a lesson for marketers as well.

    The Ghana Think Tank seeks to solve local problems in the “developed” world using a network of think tanks in the “developing” world. These think tanks analyze the problems and propose solutions, which are put into action back in the community where the problems originated (irrespective of how practical the ideas might be).

    Part public art and community action project, the Ghana Think Tank is the brainchild of Christopher Robbins, whose experience as a Peace Corps Volunteer taught him that developed world advice can often be nonsensical in the context of the developing world. 

    As an example, when the Ghana Think Tank visited Westport, Connecticut (one of the wealthiest towns in the U.S.), problems stated by residents included pesticide use, barking dogs, lack of diversity, and speeding traffic. The think tank proposed that Westport could solve its problems of lack of diversity, inter-generational mixing, and sense of isolation by having weekly walks to the neighbors. Christopher Robbins reports on the success of this solution as follows:

    The Armstrongs volunteered first. They stopped off at a bunch of neighbors they didn’t know, crashed a birthday party, even got brought through one neighbor’s backyard to the river and  offered use of their canoes. The youngest son absolutely loved it. He kept saying “this is working! This is really working! We should do this every week.”

    In this case, the suggested solution seemed to work, but many do not, instead highlighting the vast cultural differences that still divide us.

    In the world of marketing it is often assumed that what worked for a brand in its home country is bound to work elsewhere in the world. Even when a brand is adapted to meet local functional and economic needs, it is tough for people responsible for the brand at the center to suspend their mindset regarding what the brand should stand for, and how best to execute its positioning.

    The tension between global and local teams was a theme that ran through all the interviews I conducted for The Global Brand. Two solutions proffered by my interviewees were developing a sense of humility at the center and the use of common metrics. The former allows the center to quickly recognize the power of locally-originated ideas, and the latter allows the center to demonstrate the success of those ideas and encourage others to learn from them.

    Do you know of any companies that actively use cross-cultural think tanks to promote best practices? Do you have any examples you can share? Please let me know.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Nigel Hollis

    Tags: Globalisation

  • Social networking and business 101

    30 August 2011

    If you are a small business owner, you don't need to spend a lot of time or money to have a presence on the mobile internet. Free social networking tools are making it easy to create 'mobilised' content to attract and interact with consumers. You can also publish updates on your own, without having to depend on an agency or web developer.

    Best of all, you'll reach a large market segment that depends on mobile handsets to access the internet.

    In today's blog post, I'd like to share some examples with you of how major brands are using social networks. But whether you own a hair salon or a restaurant, work at a local retailer or manufacturer, you can apply these ideas to your own business in ways that will benefit your company's bottom line.

    FACEBOOK
    Some 300 – 400 million people access Facebook on a daily basis. Several hundred million additional users go to Facebook, but not as often. Facebook is the leading social network in most markets. You don't have to be a genius to create a new account or page. And it's mobile friendly. If you access www.facebook.com from a mobile device, the site will detect your handset and redirect you to the appropriate version of its mobile site, m.facebook.com, based on whether you have a touch screen or not.

    Brands as diverse as Absolut Vodka, Acura, DBS Bank, Ernst & Young and Tata Docomo have a presence on Facebook.

    Today, though, I'd like to focus on the example of AXE, a popular men’s perfume from Unilever, which wanted to launch a new product line in Indonesia.

    Prior to this campaign, AXE did not have a mobile presence. But the company realised that mobile had to be a key part of their advertising strategy. More than 40 percent of mobile users in Indonesia say they rarely, if ever, use a computer to access the internet. And the BuzzCity Advertising Network reaches over 23 million people in Indonesia. Seventy percent are men, which is AXE's target market.

    So AXE created a Facebook page and banner ads to promote it. The page offers info on AXE's latest events and promotions. The KPI for the campaign was to drive as many people as possible to “LIKE” the Facebook mobile fan page. To attract users, AXE offered a lucky draw for a free iPod Touch.

    In just five days, AXE's banner ads attracted 1.7 million impressions. The Facebook page has over 700,000 fans.

    YOUTUBE
    YouTube's technology compresses videos into formats suitable for phones. It's as easy as uploading your video. Placing a TV ad online will give it a longer shelf life and reach a wider audience. You can also consider creating content especially for the web. Take a look, for example at Harley Davidson's YouTube channel. It's produced a series of short videos about its bikes and the people who ride them.

    You don't need to produce professional videos, either. With flipcams and consumer video cameras, you can easily create and share videos of your merchandise, testimonials and more.

    Even if you don't take action, someone else might . . . particularly if your ad is amusing. A Thai consumer, for example, uploaded this video about Bridgestone tires. (The previous link was for mobile; here's a PC version.)

    TWITTER + FACEBOOK + BLOGGING + YOUTUBE

    As you can see from this photo, the Hock Gift Shop (HGS) is not a very large store. But this 'one stop army shop' is quite popular in Singapore with men performing their National Service and annual military duties (“Nsmen” and “reservists”). HGS has also adopted an integrated social media strategy to publicise its merchandise. It posts Twitter updates a couple times a week with links back to its website. The most recent entry on its blog showcases new tools that the shop has to customise t-shirts. HGS' YouTube channel shows how products are made – from engraving dog tags to using a heat press to customise t-shirts; there are a few non-product vids posted just for fun as well. And the store's Facebook page provides a forum for customers to interact with the shop & pose questions and for the store to provide updates on merchandise and pricing. HGS has a website as well; and of course there's a widget on the home page linked to HGS's Facebook feed.

    OTHER SOCIAL NETWORKS
    Your choice of which social network to use will likely vary by market. In Thailand, HI5 is popular. MySpace is pretty US & Canadian centric. So far there's no business element to Google+ yet, but keep an eye on it.

    THE POWER OF MOBILE
    Regular readers of this blog are already attuned to the advantages of mobile marketing. But did you know that the primary mode of accessing the internet for more and more people is increasingly a mobile device?

    In Russia, 19% of internet surfers rarely, if ever, use a PC to go online. In Egypt, the number is 70%. 

     

    So the bottom line here is this: social networking provides a cheap back-door onto the mobile internet so that you can market your business and interact with consumers. As always, though, you can't assume that 'if you build it, they will come'. You need also need to promote what you do. Fortunately, mobile advertising is cheap and has a high ROI.

    This post was spotted on Gammalife by BuzzCity

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Chester Ng

    Tags: Mobile, Social Media

  • SEO: Google’s Organic Search Sitelinks Offer Brands More Online Visibility

    30 August 2011

    by Doug Platts

    Brand marketers cannot afford to be passive in their online marketing efforts in today’s search culture. One of the most important aspects of today’s online marketing is in the search engine results page (SERP). Google Sitelinks are arguably the best feature to come to the search engine results page (SERP) for brands in the past 5 years. The evolution and growth of Sitelinks has been especially interesting for brand marketers to watch, and the latest changes to Sitelinks offers a very real chance for your brand to directly benefit in a big way.

    We cheered when they first appeared and for the most part cheered louder and louder up through where we stand today. The cheering came mostly out of the excitement stemming from being able to affect brand search results to some degree. The latest changes have given brands the gift of dominating the SERP for searches on their brand name.

     

    WHAT’S NEW

    Google rolled out an update, on August 16th, to the layout of Sitelinks as they appear within SERPs. These changes include:

    • The number of Sitelinks has also increased from a maximum of 8 to 12.
    • Sitelinks increased in size and now have snippets including a brief description and URL.
    • More pages are eligible. No longer limits Sitelink-eligible pages to those that are 1 directory off the root directory. Many more pages are now potential Sitelinks.
    • The amount of space given to a site within SERPs for branded searches has greatly increased with this change (iCrossing expects to see increased click-through rates for brand terms as a result of this change)

    12-PACK IMPACT
    In this situation less is not more. More is more.

    Until recently, the only pages that were eligible to be Sitelinks were pages that were pages 1 level down from the root directory. This blocked the possibility of seeing product-level pages appear as Sitelinks. This can get a site visitor deeper into your site where the majority of conversions occur.

    Users now have more options within your brand’s set of Sitelinks. A variety of additional mid-level pages can now appear as Sitelinks, which can be a strategic way to guide users toward category-level pages when these pages have proven to be strong performers.

    Internal Linking is now more important than ever. Descriptive naming conventions within anchor text and link attributes will be even more important to ensure accurate, useful Sitelinks.

    Search engines use your internal linking to determine the names of Sitelink results by determining what anchor text is used to point to the Sitelink-eligible pages. So if a Sitelink is appearing for a page you’d like to be featured but the title isn’t what you’d prefer, then look at your universal navigation files and modify the related anchor text in those files.

    Reputation Management is another business element that can be affected by smart use of Sitelinks. One application of this concept is to allow your site’s main Customer Service page to remain eligible as a Sitelink by not demoting it. If the Customer Service page is already a live Sitelink, you may want to keep it there. Sure, it’ll cost you one of the 12 Sitelink slots where you otherwise could feature a conversion-friendly page, but giving users easy access to customer service will win you some favor.

    It’s common to hear that people are fed-up by how difficult it is to find out how to contact a brand. Be the exception, sacrifice a Sitelink, and have a competent customer service staff to win over users for the long-term.

     

    Not getting your full brand coverage

    Whilst these new Sitelinks are appear for the majority of brands there are still some instances of where they are not appear, Where we have noticed this is when there is more than one domain that could be the primary brand domain for that query.

    For example DKNY has multiple domains, and so far Google has not determined which is the right brand domain to display Sitelinks for:

    Hugo Boss on the other hand does have the site links as there is no confusion

    Similarly where there is ambiguity around whether the search query is a brand term or not, for example ‘mac’ could be either the makeup brand or the Apple product

     

    I’m sure as Google analysis click-through data it will start to refine this updated and single out specific domains.

     

    WHAT YOU CAN CONTROL
    Brand marketers cannot control all aspects of Sitelinks, but Google does give us the ability to essentially block, or “demote,” specific pages from appearing as Sitelinks.

    Your Google Webmaster Tools account (sign-up here) gives you access to a list of pages from your site Google considers eligible to be a Sitelink. Even though you cannot choose which pages will appear, you can affect which page will not appear.

    In the past, Google has had the policy of allowing one block per page without the possibility of reinstatement. That no longer is the case as demotions can be turned off to allow the page to once again be eligible to appear as a Sitelink. This is an excellent opportunity to take advantage of seasonality changes in the popularity of your pages. While you can’t explicitly choose a Sitelink, you can demote pages that aren’t vital to your business goals in the current season. Google doesn’t guarantee that it will follow your wishes, and it can take time to see the changes live in search results, so we don’t recommend making drastic changes on a frequent basis.

     

    EARLY RESULTS
    Here at iCrossing, we’ve taken a look at the brands of our clients to see if more or less traffic is going to their sites from search engines since the change to Sitelinks, and they are definitely showing a significant uplift in organic click-throughs for traffic across the board.

    Any increase in organic search traffic begs the question of how branded PPC results might be affected by this change. Initial iCrossing PPC findings are forthcoming soon, but you should consider the specifics of your current  branded efforts and evaluate performance before and after this launch.

    Traffic increases are great, we’re all for them, but these surges don’t mean much if a quality site experience is missing on the other side of the click. Trends such as Google Sitelinks still require foundational best practices for your brand’s website. Take some time to examine the user experience on the pages that are eligible to appear as Sitelinks. Some fine tuning could unclog the pipes of traffic coming your way.

    Sitelinks should give you a great start by getting users to deeper pages more quickly, but it’s (as always) up to you to close the deal.

    This post was written by Doug Platts, head of Natural Search at iCrossing.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Online advertising, Search, Google

  • Making your media money work harder

    30 August 2011

    by Bob Nash

    ‘Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don’t know which half’. So said the American advertising pioneer John Wanamaker nearly a century ago – and today a modern version of this problem is causing today’s marketers bigger problems than ever.

    The trouble is this: as we all develop ever-more complicated multi media campaigns, it becomes exceptionally difficult to assess exactly which elements have the biggest effect on the campaign as a whole.

    Finding a solution for this problem can make a huge difference. Because, if you can assign a value to your spend on each channel, based on the response it drives not only by itself, but also as part of the overall campaign you’ll be able to maximise the response volume you can generate from a finite overall media spend. Granted that few organisations are keen to switch off their marketing efforts in each key channel completely just so they can work this out, sophisticated statistical analysis has to be the answer.

    WPN working with Mike Colling and Co. recently took on precisely this challenge for client The Salvation Army. It resulted in a significant improvement in the way we can plan major campaigns to optimise the media budget and generate the maximum responses.

    The process started with detailed analysis, looking at three year’s worth of results across TV, radio, online, warm DM, cold DM, door drops, press and inserts. Univariate analysis was applied to understand the key drivers of response to each channel. It’s also important to look at the ‘lagged correlation’ – that is, the effect spend today has on response tomorrow or in the following days.

    Some fascinating insights started to appear. For instance, although TV has the greatest impact on the overall effectiveness of the campaign, radio was found to have a very significant effect on TV response. Press, Inserts, Online, Cold Reminder DM and Warm Reminder DM were also  found to have a positive influence on TV Response – an increase in any of these resulted in an increase in TV Response.

    Online response, was quite different; whilst online spend had the biggest immediate effect on online reponse, the influence of spend on other media was far greater than on TV. Press, TV and radio all had a greater influence on overall online response than online spend did.

    As a result of this analysis we were able to build two marketing models using multivariate analysis to forecast donation volume by day...for varying levels of media investment...and allocated in varying proportions across different weeks.

    Obviously, the results cannot be discussed in detail. However, we can reveal that the Christmas 2010 campaign went on to become The Salvation Army’s most successful ever.


    This post was written by Bob Nash, creative director, Watson Phillips Norman, as spotted on Right Brain, Left Brain on Cream Global

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Ad Spend

  • $3bn GM global media review: cost-cutting or cost-management?

    26 August 2011

    You’ll no doubt have found it hard to miss the news that this week General Motors announced a review of its global media spend, estimated to be in excess of $3bn. The business is currently split regionally, there is no suggestion yet that this is a consolidation and we don’t yet have sight of the broad brief. I found it interesting that much of the debate and discussion when this was announced was the assumption that this was inevitably a “pre-double-dip” cost-cutting exercise which many accused Unilever and Vodafone (amongst others) of conducting in 2009 as the first recession hit adland.




    I would like to believe that this review has a strategic ambition but there’s not yet much word coming from GM, or indeed the market, to suggest this. The appointment of an auditor (R3) to run the review probably isn’t reassuring the incumbent agencies either…. 

     A review of this scale is going to remain in the headlines for its duration, many perhaps seeing it as a bell-weather for what double-dip agency reviews might look like in the coming (terrifying) 18 months for agencies. I would encourage GM and their auditors to take the opportunity to make a strategic ambition a publicly visible core of this review and hopefully avoid a frenzy of cost-cutting reviews in the wake of this big news from GM if the only news that trickles out is alarm concerning aggressive cost demands…


    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Tom Denford

    Tags: consulting, auditors, pitches, media costs

  • Shutting down social media, not the answer...

    26 August 2011

    Whether it's books, newspapers, television, and now social media, no matter what media channel or period we live in, the recurring issues of censorship and freedom of speech will never fail to haunt us. Perhaps deemed a human curse, a deeper issue related to our rights as humans, we will always demand our rights to be free to say what we want. The problem always comes when it leads to violence and civil unrest Some will argue that civil unrest is necessary to undo the tyrannical powers that control us. Others will demand censorship to control the masses. What side are you on?

    Not long ago, Egyptians thanked social media for being their tool to freedom from Mubarak and the world cheered with them. It's hard to be against freedom of press, because we all know that if it hadn't been for the printing press, we would not have seen the wealth of information shared across Europe that led to the domino effect starting with the religous wars, the French Revolution and list goes on. Indeed, freedom of speech means progress, whereas censorship is usually associated with tyrannical, corrupt governments.

    But this summer in England, freedom of speech led to violence on our streets and the issues of banning social networks are now ours too. RIM, for one, which not long ago was being confronted by India and Saudi Arabia about demanding access to customer data for national security reasons, will now have to face the UK.

    Some will argue that this summer's violence was needed, but I disagree, and according to a quick search on Twitter, I'm not alone. Shutting off social networks is not the answer. The problems go much deeper than the media channel in which the anger is unleashed. Shutting off social media, a place where we can talk freely (no matter that chatter is about) will only anger the people more. Besides, if we were to shut off social media, people would always find some other way, if they truly are unhappy.

    It seems that the notion of shutting down social networks has had people panicked. How could the UK of all countries possibly go down that route?

     

     

    And when the issue was dropped this morning, a huge sense of relief...

     

     

    But this issue may go away for a while in England, but who's to say it may not come back in a few years when some new media platform surges and leads to civil unrest? And what about the rest of the world?

    You might also like Social media-- the end of tyranny? and Government teaches a brands a lesson

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Social Media

  • Top 10 Steve Jobs infographics

    25 August 2011

    Steve Jobs stepped down today as Apple's Chief executive. As this influential figure in the media industry takes a break from the spotlight, we couldn't help but peruse the web to see what others were saying about him and his departure. In our research, we discovered that the man (and Apple) have inspired many interesting infographics--I say "interesting," because some are indeed interesting and others are well.... "interesting."  So here's to infographics and Steve Jobs, enjoy!

     

    1. Apple form factor evolution: 1976 through 2007

     

    2. What's inside Apple University?

     

    3. 15 things you didn't know about Steve Jobs

     

    4. Bill Gates versus Steve Jobs: Battle of the two computer geeks

     

     

    5. Ikea versus Apple

     

    6. The apple tree

     

     

    7. The evolution of the tablet computer

     

     

    8. Sex with Steve Jobs

     

    9. Apple rumor publishing guide

     

     

    10. The world without Apple

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Apple, Steve Jobs

  • Top 10: How can marketers embrace gaming?

    22 August 2011

    As we all know, gaming or "gamification" is increasingly becoming a hot topic with marketers. It is seen as a new way to engage consumers. "Engage" also being the hot word coming out of every marketers' mouths...! However, despite all this excitement, there is a clear disconnect between the growth of this medium and the level of understanding about the opportunites it provides among the client and media buyer community. In fact, according to recent poll by M&M, 67% of international planners and key clients feel that their knowledge of maximising marketing opportunities within gaming is below average.

    Thus, in the spirit of educating our readers and in honour of our upcoming event Extra Life, I have assembled our top 10 pieces of content -- news, opinion pieces and case studies -- where gaming meets marketing across both Cream and M&M. Enjoy!

     

    1. Why agencies aren't winning the gaming game. The meteoric rise in the last 12 months of casual games such as Angry Birds and Farmville has put brands (and their creative agencies) on alert as they consider what gaming means for their own customer outreach and engagement programmes. But as Rumbi Pfende, Country Manager for RealGames UK, explains, agencies are not always best placed to turn a good creative idea into a killer game…

     

    2. Cereal box becomes 3D console game. Nestle is being a bit more prescriptive with children's imaginations with its augmented reality cereal box. I know AR can be rather gimmicky, but this version sees the cereal box turned into a 3D video game.

    3. Doritos: putting the fun back in the dips. Everyone loves a good game and on my daily poke around cyberspace I found that Doritos is the latest brand to associate its goods with a game. Doritos Dip Desperado game [which hasn’t launched just yet] will challenge consumers to flick virtual chips into a jar of dip.

    4. Gaming for marketers. Once upon a time, a stereotypical gamer was probably male, probably single and probably rarely went out in daylight. But today gaming is a lot more universal. Casual and social gaming has attracted new audiences who would never consider themselves gamers and home gaming has become a family pastime. Gaming represents an extremely flexible marketing channel, be it through in-game advertising, apps, interactive banners or advertiser-funded games.

    5. Space age sneakers and retro gaming. Branded games have been about for years, but recently there have been some excellent examples of the genre. Thanks to the social network revolution that you might have heard about, online gaming is no longer the preserve of teenage boys and the IT crowd. 

    6. GroupM China forms gaming partnerships. GroupM China expanded its marketing opportunities within the gaming sector by forming a partnership with InGameAd, a game advertising and platform company in China.

    7. Lonely gamers find love in Japan. For a generation who grew up with Tamagotchi's and engage with programs like Foursquare, it's no surprise that the idea of having a virtual girlfriend is pretty normal for them. But this isn't Sims. This is Love Plus+.

    8. Beyond the gaming experience. For all the talk about the increasing sophistication of smartphonescan be monotonous, and the experience usually falls short of that offered by gaming consoles. Sony Ericsson and Euro RSCG wanted to provoke the idea that even idle gaming on a smartphone could be a thrilling experience.

     

    10. Germany embraces online gaming. A total 25.2 million Germans visited online gaming sites in June, according to new figures by Comscore.

    9. Building to infinity. Lego reinvents the display advertising and makes banner ads exciting.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Juliet P. d'Arguesse

    Tags: Gaming

  • Cost vs. Return: Marketers & publishers share the mobile pain, part 2

    22 August 2011

    Yesterday, I kicked off a two-part series investigating the pain points that marketers and publishers experience with their mobile strategies to offer some ideas on how to improve efforts. In Part 1, I chatted about marketers’ struggle with low engagement with the apps they create and the opportunity to first optimize their websites for mobile viewing in order to mine data to inform future app development. Now let’s take a look at what’s ailing publishers.

    Part 2: Publishers’ Challenge and Opportunity of Monetization

    Fortunately for publishers, the content they produce on a daily basis is something mobile readers want, so the publisher apps already have a much greater usage than marketers’ apps. For publishers, the pain points around mobile strategies are twofold: the rising cost of app creation and maintenance and the lack of monetization of the mobile page views currently generated on their mobile-optimized sites.

    The first problem is the rising costs associated with the creation and maintenance of having a collection of apps. We frequently hear from the largest publishers that app creation is mandatory despite the sagging returns.  Additionally, the development costs for new apps seems to be rising and the number of apps that need to be updated is also rising.  So the line we often hear from publishers is “where does it end?”

    In addition to the costs, apps are creating even more mobile inventory that needs to be sold, which brings up the second challenge: few publishers are actually selling through their existing mobile web inventory.  Unsold mobile inventory is actually the bigger problem and also happens to be the biggest opportunity. The disconnect seems to be stemming from several issues: a misinformed sales team, a focus on app development instead of monetizing pre-existing mobile traffic and the uncertainty of how to best monetize it.

    How It’s Sold

    How a publisher’s sales team actually sells mobile is part of the problem.  Many publishers do not have sales teams versed in mobile sales.   If sales teams don’t understand an opportunity and lack the excitement around selling it, the new initiative winds up at the back of the sales decks, if at all.  This is very close to what happened in the early days of selling digital with print.  The digital slides were always last, and digital was sold as an added value — often forgotten or given away to secure a bigger print buy.   Publishers would be wise not to make this mistake again on mobile because there is much more to lose (which I will explain in a later post).   Currently, mobile plays second fiddle to dot com sales and until this changes, mobile won’t get a fair play in the face-to-face meetings.

    Focusing on the Wrong Effort

    From a page view perspective, the amount of engagement larger publishers have on their mobile sites compared to apps is staggering.  The largest publishers have upwards of 100MM page views already generated (and unsold) on their mobile sites, yet the same publishers are burning large amounts of cash and resources on building apps that receive lower engagement.  Selling the existing mobile inventory is the biggest opportunity here.  With the mobile page view volume already in place, selling through the existing inventory is the low-hanging fruit. For example, if a publisher with 100MM mobile page views (this is a real example) were to garner $.60 net RPM, it would add $60,000 a month to the bottom line — and improve any publishers’ mobile P&L.

    How to Monetize?

    The big question is how do publishers earn a $.60 RPM on their pages?  Carla Rover over at DigiDay wrote about the Trouble with Mobile Ads and cites this fragmented situation.  It’s a hard problem to solve.  In contrast to desktop publisher pages, where interruptive ad units have found a home, mobile readers simply do not want to be interrupted and have little tolerance for interruptive ad units. Thus, publishers are forced to find other creative solutions for generating revenue.

    Here at Outbrain, we offer publishers a different kind of solution for mobile revenue generation – we offer mobile readers links to third party, quality content that is also made for mobile viewing. Other revenue-generating solutions likely include mobile content that is produced by a publisher and sponsored by an advertiser.  For example, you can see a company like HopStop sponsoring the creation of a “New York Subway Tips and Tricks” article that a publisher like NY Daily News writes and publishes on their mobile site with a “brought to you by HopStop” disclosure.

    Some publishers are testing overlays, which in my opinion will not scale.  Overlays on mobile content is an annoyance and is based on “accidental monetization” – clicks coming from misguided thumbs trying to tap on something else, probably the close or back button. No matter the solution, on the small screen, monetization must include real value for all three of the critical players, the mobile reader, the publisher and the marketer.

    Digging a bit deeper into the monetization situation on publisher mobile sites, it’s the actual device manufacturers that are driving the current demand.  As you would expect, device manufacturers want to target mobile users by device. For example, Android would love to run on CNN’s mobile web pages that are displayed to iPhone users.  This is akin to special interest magazine sales, where endemic advertisers will always want to run against segments of the endemic audience.  Outside of this nascent device manufacturer activity, demand basically drops off a cliff and as a result, most mobile optimized page views for publishers go unsold.  Like magazines, mobile sales teams need to reach outside of the endemic sales demand in order to increase the revenue generation.

    Looking Ahead

    So, we have a long way to go here on the publisher side, from how to sell through on the existing mobile inventory, to the technical perspective of how to best display content with revenue-generating units included. Of all categories, mobile page views are the only real growth metric for publisher inventory and a critical piece of any publisher’s strategic playbook.

    While apps continue to bother both marketers and publishers from an ROI perspective, the real opportunity lies in ensuring their own sites are optimized for mobile and then leveraging the opportunities that follow.  Once publishers get better at selling their mobile pages — where they already have volume — agencies and marketers will follow with much larger budgets and change the current mindset of mobile as a painful cost center to a revenue generator.  With bigger buys will come more data for marketers, which will fuel growth in overall mobile spend.  Then, with more data flowing through the mobile eco-system, creating targeted mobile environments and apps from a position of strength will be much easier for both publishers and marketers alike.

    Outbrain will be moderating a panel at DigiDay Mobile on September 21st in NYC with several top publishers talking about these very issues.  Please join us there to extend the conversation or let us know your thoughts about the pains with mobile in the comments below.

     

    John LoGioco is Senior Vice President, Sales & Business Development at Outbrain. Follow him on Twitter. Photo by Johan Larsson on Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

    The original post can be found on the Outbrain blog.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: John LoGioco

  • So why should I "like" or "follow" my yoghurt brand?

    19 August 2011

    According to the Irish Times (2011), the Irish are the most prolific users of social media in Europe and more businesses use social media here than any other European country.

    What I love about social media is getting live research about a brand. It is in fact a giant real-time conversation that companies can jump on to uncover insights and opportunities for improvement.

    For example, if I type Groupon into Twitter, I see comments from all over the world about the company. People are saying it is going bankrupt, and journalists are tweeting articles suggesting it is an unfocused voucher site. I also see complaints about coupons expiring and negative comments about meaningless vouchers for things people don't want.

    From this insight, I have the bones of a strategy to focus on. In addition, I can start to build my community based on the insights I have gotten from those in it!

    Based on the above, a Groupon strategy could focus on:

    • Brand equity
    • Targeting 
    • Reassurance
    • Consumer focus

     

    I am referring to the phenomenon which has spread from the US, the "like" button or the "follow" button through Facebook and Twitter.

    The question being asked in America and spreading all over the world currently is, "Why should I "like" my brand on social media?" Brian Solis and other experts in social media say this is the first question a business must ask themselves. This is discussed in the video below. Once a consumer clicks "like" or "follow" they are generating money for the brand and for the social network, it is a business transaction. We in business want to make profit, but we don't want to dent our reputation, which is arguably the cornerstone of our business. Social media is the fastest way to spread positive or (negative) word of mouth about a company.

    Therefore, we must consider the key questions: 

    • Why are we doing this marketing? 
    • What are our goals for the company and what are the goals for our consumers? 
    • What reputation do we want to simulate online for ourselves and how do we make this positive?
    • How can we use this experience to grow?

    We are increasingly seeing more information being supplied next to the "like" or "follow" button.

    facebook iconJoin our community on Facebook. Ask questions and share experiences, find reports on the latest research and learn about the free seminars and support groups we offer.

    Bigger brands implement welcome page interface offering the user an experience and providing detailed information and answers to questions.

    What can we do next...?

     


    This post was spotted on MYKL's Blog.

    For more on social media, you might also want to read The price of loyalty by Ben Bold and Integrated social media drives sales by Jenni Baker.

    Comments (0) | Permalink

    Posted by: Michael-Philippe Bosonnet

    Tags: Social Media

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. Next page